Terrain & Site Intelligence · In productization
Candidate Site Ranking & Portfolio Decision Intelligence
Which candidate sites should be investigated first, and what evidence explains their relative ranking?
An auditable candidate-site comparison and shortlist that preserves exclusions, coverage limitations, robustness and decision-policy assumptions.
Not yet orderable. This service is company-integrated at the scientific/product-definition layer but remains outside the released commercial catalogue until its complete delivery and OWNER publication gates are satisfied.
Remaining release gates
- Commercial Decision Profile
- Service Delivery Philosophy
- Owner Publication Approval
Planned professional deliverables
- Candidate-site ranking table
- Per-site zonal evidence statistics
- Eligibility and exclusion summary
- Consensus and robust suitability metrics
- Within-site variability metrics
- Explainable ranking record
- Candidate shortlist
- Methodology, provenance and limitations
- GIS-ready candidate boundaries with decision attributes
- Professional consulting dossier
Validated capabilities underneath
- Candidate Site Zonal Aggregation
- Candidate Site Ranking
- Candidate Portfolio Decision Intelligence
- Site Suitability Robustness
- Site Suitability Explainability
Professional boundaries
- Rankings are relative screening evidence and are not legal, investment, planning, permitting, environmental or engineering approvals.
- Candidate boundaries, scenario definitions and ranking policy are governed project inputs; SPATIAVERA does not invent stakeholder preferences.
- Hard exclusions remain binding and cannot be compensated by ranking weights.
- Candidate ranking quality depends on upstream data quality, spatial alignment, candidate-zone completeness and the decision assumptions supplied for the project.